Download "FULL DISCUSSION: Canada PM Carney Predicts New World Order Without US at Explosive WEF Speech | AC1G"
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FpWP8RtXorCo%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
Similar videos from our catalog
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FflsgJe8mN-A%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252F-H6-4jgtIwE%252Fhqdefault.jpg%253Fsqp%253D-oaymwEmCOADEOgC8quKqQMa8AEB-AH-BIAC4AOKAgwIABABGGUgZShlMA8%253D%2526rs%253DAOn4CLA98FRWzqUbF2RuGbXJUFuCHO_Jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FDjxy32nP3MU%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FF5WPmxqE2LY%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FSABXlduqIQ4%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FZdZEzbMbT74%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FacIt9XzROCw%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FcgrrF_kLdhM%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252Fjav4tS2cfeE%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FtTboqGEwbdU%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
Video tags
Subtitles
00:00:00
is submitted to no limits, no00:00:02
constraints.00:00:05
On the other hand, I would like to uh00:00:07
tell you that the other countries,00:00:08
especially intermediate powers like00:00:10
Canada, are not powerless.00:00:14
They have the capacity to build a new00:00:17
order that encompasses our values00:00:20
such as respect for human rights,00:00:23
sustainable development, solidarity,00:00:26
sovereignty,00:00:28
and territorial integrity of the various00:00:31
states.00:00:33
>> The power of the less power00:00:37
starts with honesty.00:00:40
It seems that every day we're reminded00:00:44
that we live in an era of great power00:00:47
rivalry, that the rules-based order is00:00:50
fading, that the strong can do what they00:00:53
can and the weak must suffer what they00:00:56
must. And this apherism of Thusidities00:01:00
is presented as inevitable, as the00:01:03
natural logic of international relations00:01:06
reasserting itself.00:01:08
And faced with this logic,00:01:10
there is a strong tendency for countries00:01:14
to go along to get along, to00:01:17
accommodate,00:01:19
to avoid trouble, to hope that00:01:21
compliance will buy safety.00:01:25
Well, it won't.00:01:28
So, what are our options?00:01:30
In 1978, the Czech dissident Vaslav00:01:33
Havl, later president,00:01:36
wrote an essay called the power of the00:01:38
powerless. And in it, he asked a simple00:01:41
question. How did the communist system00:01:44
sustain itself?00:01:46
And his answer began with a green00:01:47
grosser. Every morning, this shopkeeper00:01:51
places a sign in his window, workers of00:01:54
the world unite.00:01:56
He doesn't believe it. No one does. But00:01:59
he places the sign anyway to avoid00:02:01
trouble, to signal compliance, to get00:02:04
along. And because every shopkeeper on00:02:07
every street does the same, the system00:02:09
persists,00:02:11
not through violence alone, but through00:02:14
the participation of ordinary people in00:02:16
rituals they privately know to be false.00:02:21
Havl called this living within a lie.00:02:24
The system's power comes not from its00:02:26
truth, but from everyone's willingness00:02:28
to perform as if it were true.00:02:32
And its fragility comes from the same00:02:34
source. When even one person stops00:02:38
performing, when the green grosser00:02:40
removes his sign, the illusion begins to00:02:42
crack.00:02:44
Friends, it is time for companies and00:02:48
countries to take their signs down.00:02:53
For decades,00:02:56
[applause]00:03:01
for decades, countries like Canada00:03:03
prospered under what we called the00:03:04
rules-based international order. We00:03:06
joined its institutions. We praised its00:03:09
principles. We benefited from its00:03:11
predictability.00:03:12
And because of that, we could pursue00:03:14
values-based foreign policies under its00:03:16
protection.00:03:18
We knew the story of the international00:03:20
rulesbased order was partially false.00:03:23
That the strongest would exempt00:03:25
themselves when convenient. That trade00:03:27
rules were enforced s asymmetrically.00:03:32
And we knew that international law00:03:34
applied with varying rigor depending on00:03:35
the identity of the accused or the00:03:38
victim.00:03:40
This fiction was useful and American00:03:42
hegemony in particular helped provide00:03:45
public goods, open sea lanes, a stable00:03:48
financial system, collective security00:03:51
and support for frameworks for resolving00:03:53
disputes.00:03:54
So we placed the sign in the window. We00:03:58
participated in the rituals and we00:04:01
largely avoided calling out the gaps00:04:04
between rhetoric and reality.00:04:07
This bargain no longer works. Let me be00:04:10
direct. We are in the midst of a00:04:13
rupture, not a transition.00:04:16
Over the past two decades, a series of00:04:18
crises in finance, health, energy, and00:04:20
geopolitics have laid bare the risks of00:04:22
extreme global integration. But more00:04:25
recently, great powers have begun using00:04:28
economic integration as weapons. Tariffs00:04:31
as leverage, financial infrastructure as00:04:33
coercion, supply chains as00:04:35
vulnerabilities to be exploited.00:04:38
You cannot live within the lie of mutual00:04:41
benefit through integration. When00:04:43
integration becomes the source of your00:04:47
subordination,00:04:50
the multilateral institutions on which00:04:52
the middle powers have relied, the WTO,00:04:55
the UN, the COP, the architecture, the00:04:59
very architecture of collective problem00:05:02
solving are under threat.00:05:05
And as a result, many countries are00:05:07
drawing the same conclusions that they00:05:09
must develop greater strategic autonomy00:05:12
in energy, food, critical minerals, in00:05:14
finance and supply chains. And this00:05:17
impulse is understandable. A country00:05:20
that can't feed itself, fuel itself, or00:05:22
defend itself has few options. When the00:05:25
rules no longer protect you, you must00:05:28
protect yourself.00:05:30
But let's be cleareyed about where this00:05:32
leads.00:05:33
A world of fortresses will be poorer,00:05:35
more fragile, and less sustainable.00:05:39
And there's another truth. If great00:05:42
powers abandon even the pretense of00:05:44
rules and values for the unhindered00:05:46
pursuit of their power and interests,00:05:49
the gains from transactionalism00:05:52
will become harder to replicate.00:05:55
Hegeons cannot continually monetize00:05:59
their relationships.00:06:01
Allies will diversify to hedge against00:06:04
uncertainty.00:06:06
They'll buy insurance, increase options00:06:09
in order to rebuild sovereignty.00:06:11
Sovereignty that was once grounded in00:06:13
rules, but will increasingly be anchored00:06:16
in the ability to withstand pressure.00:06:21
This room knows this is classic risk00:06:24
management. Risk management comes at a00:06:27
price.00:06:29
But that cost of strategic autonomy of00:06:31
sovereignty can also be shared.00:06:34
Collective investments in resilience are00:06:36
cheaper than everyone building their own00:06:39
fortresses.00:06:40
Shared standards reduce fragmentations.00:06:43
Complimentarities are positive sum. And00:06:47
the question for middle powers like00:06:49
Canada is not whether to adapt to the00:06:52
new reality. We must. The question is00:06:55
whether we adapt by simply building00:06:57
higher walls or whether we can do00:06:59
something more ambitious.00:07:03
Now Canada was amongst the first to hear00:07:06
the wakeup call leading us to00:07:08
fundamentally shift our strategic00:07:10
posture.00:07:12
Canadians know that our old comfortable00:07:14
assumptions that our geography and00:07:15
alliance memberships automatically00:07:17
conferred prosperity and security.00:07:21
That assumption is no longer valid.00:07:24
And our new approach rests on what00:07:26
Alexander Stub, the president of00:07:27
Finland, has termed valuebased realism.00:07:31
Or to put another way, we aim to be both00:07:34
principled and pragmatic.00:07:37
Principled in our commitment to00:07:38
fundamental values, sovereignty,00:07:41
territorial integrity, the prohibition00:07:43
of the use of force except when00:07:44
consistent with the UN charter and00:07:47
respect for human rights. and pragmatic00:07:50
in recognizing that progress is often00:07:52
incremental, that interests diverge,00:07:55
that not every partner will share all of00:07:58
our values. So, we're engaging broadly,00:08:01
strategically with open eyes. We00:08:03
actively take on the world as it is, not00:08:07
wait around for a world we wish to be.00:08:11
We are calibrating our relationships so00:08:14
their depth reflects our values. And00:08:16
we're prioritizing broad engagement to00:08:19
maximize our influence given and given00:08:21
the fluidity of the world at the moment,00:08:23
the risks that this poses and the stakes00:08:26
for what comes next.00:08:29
And we are no longer just relying on the00:08:31
strength of our values, but also the00:08:32
value of our strength.00:08:36
We are building that strength at home.00:08:39
Since my government took office, we have00:08:41
cut taxes on incomes, on capital gains00:08:44
and business investment. We have removed00:08:46
all federal barriers to interprovincial00:08:48
trade. We are fast-tracking a trillion00:08:50
dollars of investments in energy, AI,00:08:53
critical minerals, new trade corridors,00:08:55
and beyond. We're doubling our defense00:08:57
spending by the end of this decade, and00:08:59
we're doing so in ways that build our00:09:01
domestic industries.00:09:03
And we are rapidly diversifying abroad.00:09:06
We've agreed a comprehensive strategic00:09:08
partnership with the EU, including00:09:11
joining SAFE, the European defense00:09:14
procurement arrangements. We have signed00:09:16
12 other trade and security deals on00:09:19
four continents in six months. In the00:09:22
past few days, we've concluded new00:09:23
strategic partnerships with China and00:09:26
Qatar. We're negotiating free trade00:09:28
packs with India, ASEAN, Thailand,00:09:31
Philippines, and Merkasur.00:09:34
We're doing something else. To help00:09:36
solve global problems, we're pursuing00:09:39
variable geometry. In other words,00:09:41
different coalitions for different00:09:43
issues based on common values and00:09:45
interests. So on Ukraine, we're a core00:09:48
member of the coalition of the willing00:09:50
and one of the largest per capita00:09:52
contributors to its defense and00:09:54
security.00:09:56
on Arctic's sovereignty. We stand firmly00:09:59
with Greenland and Denmark and fully00:10:01
support their unique right to determine00:10:04
Greenland's future.00:10:08
[applause]00:10:14
Our commitment to NATO's Article 5 is00:10:16
unwavering.00:10:18
So, we're working with our NATO allies,00:10:21
including the Nordic Baltic Gate, to00:10:24
further secure the alliance's northern00:10:26
and western flanks, including through00:10:29
Canada's unprecedented investments in00:10:32
over the horizon radar, in submarines,00:10:35
in aircraft, and boots on the ground,00:10:38
boots on the ice.00:10:40
Canada strongly opposes tariffs over00:10:42
Greenland and calls for focused talks to00:10:46
achieve our shared objectives of00:10:49
security and prosperity in the Arctic.00:10:53
On plurilateral trade, we're championing00:10:55
efforts to build a bridge between the00:10:57
Trans-Pacific Partnership in the00:10:58
European Union, which would create a new00:11:01
trading block of 1.5 billion people. On00:11:05
critical minerals, we're forming buyers00:11:06
clubs anchored in the G7 so that the00:11:08
world can diversify away from00:11:10
concentrated supply. And on AI, we're00:11:14
cooperating with like-minded democracies00:11:17
to ensure that we won't ultimately be00:11:19
forced to choose between hegeimons and00:11:22
hyperscalers.00:11:25
This is not naive multilateralism,00:11:28
nor is it relying on00:11:30
their institutions. It's building00:11:33
coalitions that work issues by issue00:11:36
with partners who share enough common00:11:38
ground to act together.00:11:40
In some cases, this will be the vast00:11:43
majority of nations. What it's doing is00:11:47
creating a dense web of connections00:11:48
across trade investment culture on which00:11:51
we can draw for future challenges and00:11:53
opportunities.00:11:57
argue that middle powers must act00:11:59
together because if we're not at the00:12:00
table, we're on the menu.00:12:05
But I'd also say that great powers great00:12:08
powers can afford for now to go it00:12:10
alone. They have the market size, the00:12:12
military capacity, and the leverage to00:12:15
dictate terms. Middle powers do not. But00:12:19
when we only negotiate bilaterally with00:12:21
a hedgeimon, we negotiate from weakness.00:12:24
We accept what's offered. We compete00:12:27
with each other to be the most00:12:29
accommodating.00:12:30
This is not sovereignty. It's the00:12:33
performance of sovereignty while00:12:34
accepting subordination.00:12:38
In a world of great power rivalry, the00:12:40
countries in between have a choice.00:12:43
Compete with each other for favor or to00:12:46
combine to create a third path with00:12:49
impact.00:12:52
We shouldn't allow the rise of hard00:12:54
power to blind us to the fact that the00:12:57
power of legitimacy, integrity, and00:12:59
rules will remain strong if we choose to00:13:02
wield them together,00:13:05
which brings me back to Hav.00:13:08
What does it mean for middle powers to00:13:11
live the truth? Well, first, it means00:13:13
naming reality. Stop invoking00:13:16
rules-based international order as00:13:18
though it still functions as advertised.00:13:21
Call it what it is, a system of00:13:23
intensifying great power rivalry where00:13:26
the most powerful pursue their interests00:13:28
using economic integration as coercion.00:13:32
It means acting consistently, applying00:13:35
the same standards to allies and rivals.00:13:38
When middle powers criticize economic00:13:40
intimidation from one direction but stay00:13:43
silent when it comes from another, we00:13:45
are keeping the sign in the window.00:13:49
It means building what we claim to00:13:51
believe in rather than waiting for the00:13:54
old order to be restored. It means00:13:56
creating institutions and agreements00:13:58
that function as described.00:14:01
And it means reducing the leverage that00:14:03
enables coercion. That's building a00:14:06
strong domestic economy. should be every00:14:08
government's immediate priority.00:14:10
And diversification internationally is00:14:13
not just economic prudence. It's a00:14:15
material foundation for honest foreign00:14:17
policy because countries earn the right00:14:19
to principled stands by reducing their00:14:22
vulnerability to retaliation.00:14:26
So Canada00:14:29
has what the world wants. We are an00:14:32
energy superpower. We hold vast reserves00:14:35
of critical minerals. We have the most00:14:37
educated population in the world. Our00:14:40
pension funds are amongst the world's00:14:42
largest and most sophisticated00:14:43
investors. In other words, we have00:14:45
capital, talent. We also have a00:14:48
government with immense fiscal capacity00:14:50
to act decisively.00:14:53
And we have the values to which many00:14:56
others aspire.00:14:58
Canada is a pluralistic society that00:15:01
works. Our public square is loud,00:15:03
diverse, and free. Canadians remain00:15:06
committed to sustainability.00:15:09
We are a stable and reliable partner in00:15:12
a world that is anything but. A partner00:15:15
that builds and values relationships for00:15:17
the long term.00:15:19
And we have something else. We have a00:15:21
recognition of what's happening and a00:15:23
determination to act accordingly. We00:15:26
understand that this rupture calls for00:15:28
more than adaptation. It calls for00:15:30
honesty about the world as it is. We are00:15:33
taking the sign out of the window. We00:15:36
know the old order is not coming back.00:15:39
We shouldn't mourn it. Nostalgia is not00:15:42
a strategy.00:15:44
But we believe that from the fracture,00:15:46
we can build something bigger, better,00:15:48
stronger, more just. This is the task of00:15:52
the middle powers, the countries that00:15:54
have the most to lose from a world of00:15:56
fortresses and a most to gain from00:15:59
genuine cooperation.00:16:02
The powerful have their power,00:16:05
but we have something too. The capacity00:16:08
to stop pretending, to name reality, to00:16:11
build our strength at home, and to act00:16:14
together.00:16:15
That is Canada's path. We choose it00:16:19
openly and confidently, and it is a path00:16:22
wide open to any country willing to take00:16:26
it with us. Thank you very much.00:16:46
>> [applause]00:16:50
>> Well, thank you, Prime Minister. Um, I00:16:52
don't think I've seen many standing00:16:53
ovations at Davos, so uh that was that00:16:55
was interesting. Um you said there was a00:16:58
phrase in your speech where you said00:16:59
sovereignty now is the ability to00:17:01
withstand pressure.00:17:03
>> Isn't Canada almost uniquely vulnerable00:17:07
to pressure because of the extent of00:17:09
your trade dependency.00:17:31
uh that's not there there are pockets of00:17:33
extreme pressure without question in00:17:34
Canada. Uh but headline we're reacting.00:17:38
The second thing and it's a fundamental00:17:40
point is the recognition that we can00:17:42
give ourselves far more than any foreign00:17:46
country can take away. Uh there's lots00:17:48
of efficiencies in having one Canadian00:17:50
market, the trillion dollars of domestic00:17:52
investment and building these00:17:55
partnerships abroad. Uh all of which are00:17:58
bigger returns than what's been lost.00:18:01
That's not to say we would rather not00:18:03
lose it, but we can withstand the00:18:05
pressure and we are.00:18:06
>> And I was interested that you said00:18:07
basically the old world's not coming00:18:09
back. So you're not seeing this as a00:18:10
period where you just have to get00:18:12
through and normaly will return. I think00:18:15
the00:18:16
that is what that is our view. Um and we00:18:20
we regret it, but we're not going to sit00:18:22
around and and and mourn it. We're we're00:18:23
we're acting um and we're acting in a00:18:28
way both that's in our interests, but we00:18:30
believe in a way with others that's00:18:33
building imperfectly in steps a new00:18:36
system. I'll give you one example in00:18:37
handback which is um we're members of we00:18:41
are members of trade agreements that00:18:43
comprise already 1.4 billion people00:18:46
around the world. So we have the most00:18:47
extensive network we are trying with00:18:50
others to bring some of those networks00:18:52
together. The most prominent example is00:18:54
the trans-pacific partnership in the EU00:18:57
acting of a bridge. It's it's not a00:18:59
direct benefit for Canada but it is a00:19:01
benefit for Canada that these groups00:19:03
come together. uh Eng Goi is here00:19:06
consistent with the WTO rules, both of00:19:09
which are and in that way we're building00:19:12
back out amongst willing partners.00:19:15
>> And you talked about uh the need not to00:19:19
put the sign in the window anymore to to00:19:21
pretend that things are still the same.00:19:24
>> Do you think to put it directly that the00:19:26
NATO alliance is still doing that, still00:19:28
pretending it's the old transatlantic00:19:30
partnership when it's really kind of00:19:32
going? Well, uh I think clearly NATO is00:19:37
experiencing a test right now. Uh and00:19:40
the first response to that test has to00:19:42
be to respond in a way that ensures the00:19:45
the security of the Arctic in a robust00:19:48
way for uh for all possibilities. This00:19:53
is actually a point that we have been00:19:54
making in recent years. It's a point00:19:56
that I made at the NATO summit uh back00:19:59
in June which seemed like a pledging00:20:01
summit but also was a uh uh was to get00:20:04
NATO policies in the right direction. So00:20:07
I think in the immediate term one of the00:20:10
imperatives is to reinforce things that00:20:14
Canada is doing, Nordic Baltic 8 are00:20:16
doing, uh the UK are doing, other NATO00:20:18
partners, France included, in a00:20:20
comprehensive way that pro provides much00:20:23
greater security uh in the Arctic.00:20:26
That's this is the test. And so I00:20:28
wouldn't say the sign the NATO sign00:20:30
stays in the window, but we've got to00:20:32
meet the uh meet the moment of that. You00:20:34
also a big theme of your speech was the00:20:37
need for middle powers to work together,00:20:39
>> but you'd just been to the other great00:20:40
power to China. And I think people very00:20:44
intrigued by seeing that meeting and00:20:47
some people say kind of that's a mistake00:20:50
really because you know you're going to00:20:52
make yourself more dependent on China.00:20:54
They're not that benign either. Um the00:20:57
US will be very annoyed. What's what's00:20:59
the defense of what you're doing and00:21:00
what do you hope to get out of it?00:21:01
>> Uh well the the first thing is to say00:21:03
it's not a defense. It's it's an I know00:21:05
the way you frame the question, but it's00:21:07
offense. Um it's building out. It's it's00:21:09
something positive as opposed to um00:21:12
against. We're for something as opposed00:21:14
to being against. The second is00:21:17
there are very clear guard rails in that00:21:19
relationship. I spoke of calibration of00:21:21
relationships in my remarks. That's what00:21:23
I mean by it. Um but within those clear00:21:26
guard rails are huge opportunities in00:21:28
energy, both clean and conventional. uh00:21:30
obviously in motor vehicles, in00:21:32
agriculture, in financial services, all00:21:34
of which is mutually beneficial. So it's00:21:37
it's additive and I look it's the second00:21:39
largest economy and it's our second00:21:40
largest trading partner. We should have00:21:42
a strategic partnership with them uh in00:21:45
that uh in within those guardrails and00:21:47
that's what we've achieved. And it is an00:21:49
interesting reversal though because I00:21:51
think certainly during the Biden00:21:52
administration there was this sense that00:21:54
the western world was trying to decouple00:21:56
from China or derisk at least. Yeah.00:21:59
>> And is now in this new world that really00:22:01
going to go into reverse and de-risking00:22:03
from China because there are other risks00:22:05
is is less of a a thing.00:22:08
>> You need again many in this room this is00:22:10
their livelihood. You need a web of00:22:12
connections. Um and to miss out in that00:22:15
web some of the largest ones, United00:22:18
States, we already have that. Uh China,00:22:20
India, Merkasaur, European Union, that's00:22:23
a mistake. That's not managing your00:22:25
relationships properly. That makes you00:22:27
stronger, makes you more resilient. And00:22:28
then on top of that, I'll give you00:22:30
again, I'll appeal since it's in the00:22:32
headlines to the Nordics. Uh Nordics00:22:35
plus Canada, it's 20% of global GDP.00:22:38
It's not the first thing people would00:22:40
realize, but that relationship which is00:22:41
deepening for security reasons because00:22:44
we're like-minded, those are the types00:22:47
of partnerships that I think we'll see00:22:48
more of.00:22:49
>> And you got a round of applause when you00:22:51
said something strong about standing on00:22:54
principle on Greenland.00:22:56
>> Do you think uh we can find an offramp00:23:00
on that? I mean, I'm sure you you'll00:23:02
speak of it, but put it this way, if00:23:04
there isn't an offramp, where does this00:23:05
go? Uh I I strongly believe that uh00:23:09
there is a better there's a better00:23:10
outcome that come from the discussions00:23:12
that have been catalyzed in a unusual00:23:15
way admittedly but uh uh and we00:23:18
absolutely stand by uh the principles00:23:20
that I that I referenced. Um that00:23:24
solution starts with security and a00:23:28
security yes of Greenland but more00:23:29
broadly of the Arctic. Uh Canada is four00:23:32
square uh contributing to that. uh we're00:23:35
at the start of a major ramp up above00:23:37
and beyond. So we will be a major uh00:23:39
contributor to that. NATO has to deliver00:23:42
on that. We're working intensively in00:23:44
order to do it as well. Uh prosperity00:23:47
for the people of Greenland uh this in00:23:50
the end it comes back uh to the people00:23:53
there and there are opportunities to do00:23:55
that in ways that would strengthen uh00:23:57
all of the alliance.00:23:58
>> And when President Trump says oh you00:24:00
know Greenland's under threat from00:24:01
Russia, even from China, is that for00:24:04
real?00:24:06
Uh I would say that there are there are00:24:09
threat Russia is without question a00:24:12
threat in the Arctic without question.00:24:14
Russia does lots of horrible things. Uh00:24:17
and I'll take the opportunity to u to00:24:20
condemn their unjustified and uh00:24:23
horrific uh assault on Ukraine uh almost00:24:26
at its fourth year. uh they are a real00:24:28
threat uh in the Arctic uh one against00:24:31
we need to protect which is why we have00:24:35
364 5day air sea and land presence it's00:24:39
why we're uh adding to our submarine00:24:41
fleet adding to our uh air fighter uh00:24:44
fleet uh why we're building out over the00:24:46
horizon radar to protect from Russian uh00:24:49
missile threats and others uh and why we00:24:51
will work with our NATO NATO partners00:24:55
the threat is more prec perspective than00:24:58
actual at this stage in terms of actual00:25:01
activity uh in the Arctic and we intend00:25:03
to uh to keep it that way.00:25:05
>> Another big issue that's going to come00:25:07
up this week uh is this board of peace00:25:10
uh that President Trump is keen on. Uh00:25:12
I'm not sure whether it's for Gaza or00:25:14
for the entire world, but apparently00:25:16
Canada's been invited. Are you going to00:25:18
join? >> Uh we have been invited. Um and uh let00:25:21
me start by uh I I think we should00:25:23
recognize the progress that has been00:25:26
made um in at least uh getting to the00:25:30
towards the end of the first phase of00:25:33
this of this process and the activation00:25:35
if I can put it that way of the process00:25:38
to set up the border of peace is the00:25:39
start of phase two. U our view is and00:25:44
and that's to be welcomed and this is a00:25:45
this is a a positive vehicle. Our view00:25:48
is we need to work on the actual00:25:51
structure of the vehicle. You just00:25:52
referenced is it for Gaza? Well, the UN00:25:56
uh resolution, security council00:25:58
resolution 2803 references a border00:26:01
peace for Gaza. That's where we see it00:26:04
becoming immediately operative and it00:26:06
needs to be in our view it's better to00:26:08
be designed in that way for the00:26:10
immediate uh needs there. There are many00:26:12
other needs around the world. First00:26:14
point, second point. uh it needs to00:26:16
coincide with the immediate full flow of00:26:20
humanitarian aid into Gaza. We are still00:26:23
not where we need to be. Conditions00:26:24
still are horrific. Uh so that needs to00:26:27
come alongside. We think there's aspects00:26:29
of the governance and the00:26:31
decision-making process that could be00:26:33
improved. Uh but we will work uh with00:26:35
others uh obviously work with the United00:26:37
States um because we will do anything00:26:41
that we can to improve the situation00:26:44
terrific situation there and to move uh00:26:48
onto a path to a two a true two-state00:26:50
solution.00:26:51
>> There's a suggestion you can get00:26:52
permanent membership of the border of00:26:54
peace uh by pwning up a billion dollars.00:26:57
Uh you you going to write a check for00:26:58
that? uh we would write checks uh and00:27:02
deliver in kind to uh improve uh the00:27:06
welfare of the people of Palestine, but00:27:09
we want to see it uh delivered direct uh00:27:11
to those outcomes, those outcomes00:27:13
promoting peace. Uh and so the mechanics00:27:15
and how it how it works that way.00:27:17
>> Okay, final question. Um00:27:20
President Trump and a lot of people who00:27:22
agree with him condemn globalism a lot.00:27:25
Um, and I I suspect, you know, you you00:27:29
would be the kind of epitome of a00:27:31
globalist. You know, you worked for00:27:32
Goldman Sachs. I believe you were a00:27:34
central banker. Um, you know, you're00:27:36
comfortable in lived in several00:27:38
countries. Is globalism first of all, is00:27:41
it a thing? And is it over?00:27:44
Um00:27:46
I think well look understanding how the00:27:49
world works having an appreciation for00:27:51
other cultures understanding the00:27:53
connections and and being able to or at00:27:56
least appreciating uh ways that how we00:27:59
connect whether it's through technology,00:28:01
trade, investment, culture, uh can00:28:03
enrich our lives and that's a good thing00:28:06
and also help solve problems. being00:28:09
detached from where you live and the00:28:11
broader needs of society. Uh00:28:15
there is an epithet for that. I I I00:28:18
don't know that the G-word is the one.00:28:20
uh that certainly what we're finding to00:28:24
go back to uh the points I was making is00:28:27
that there are a number of like-minded00:28:29
countries00:28:31
that want to work through uh through00:28:35
partnership uh to achieve those goals00:28:37
for their citizens and for the world uh00:28:39
more more broadly. The call is for more00:28:43
to recognize00:28:45
what's really going on right now and to00:28:48
uh and to pull their resources to the00:28:50
benefit of citizens. So it won't be00:28:52
global. It won't cover the globe. Uh but00:28:55
it will um be more powerful.00:28:58
>> Okay, Prime Minister, thank you very00:28:59
much indeed.Description:
DRM News provides live coverage from Davos as Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney delivers a special address at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2026. The speech outlines Canada's strategy for navigating the emerging world order, attracting investment, diversifying trade, and fostering pragmatic international partnerships amid current geopolitical and economic pressures. Join for real-time delivery, key messages, and analysis of implications for global cooperation and Canada's role. Watch now. Mark Carney, WEF Davos 2026, Canadian Prime Minister, special address Davos, World Economic Forum, Canada investment pitch, emerging world order, economic diversification, trade partnerships, global resilience, Davos keynote, pragmatic diplomacy, transatlantic tensions, US tariffs impact, G7 Macron meeting, natural resources Canada, advanced technologies investment, breaking news Davos, international economics, live WEF coverage, DRM News LIVE: Canadian PM Mark Carney Special Address at Davos WEF 2026 ---------------------------------------------------------- Welcome to DRM News – your go-to source for breaking news and expert analysis on global affairs, showbiz, sports, AI, financial markets, and more. We believe that democracy dies in darkness, and we're committed to informing and educating you with unbiased, fact-based reporting. At DRM News, we operate independently, without influence from corporations, advertisers, or governments. We cover the stories that matter – even the ones others avoid – because you deserve the truth. Got a story idea or valuable feedback? 💡 Send us an email at info@newsdrm.com — whether it’s a tip, your opinion, or a topic you’d like to see covered. 🔔 Subscribe for daily updates 👍 Like, share, and comment to join the conversation 📢 Your voice matters – let us know what you think! #BreakingNews #InternationalNews #AI #Sports #Showbiz #FinancialMarkets #DRMNews DRM News YouTube Channel is managed by Dot Republic Media, All Copyrights Reserved. Subscribe to our channel for all the latest updates: https://www.youtube.com/@DRMNewsInternational?si=DAEwvoAQi_fcsvQp Like our Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser Follow us on Instagram: https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser
Mediafile available in formats
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players
Questions about downloading video
How can I download "FULL DISCUSSION: Canada PM Carney Predicts New World Order Without US at Explosive WEF Speech | AC1G" video?
http://univideos.ru/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.
The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.
UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.
UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.
Which format of "FULL DISCUSSION: Canada PM Carney Predicts New World Order Without US at Explosive WEF Speech | AC1G" video should I choose?
The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.
Why does my computer freeze when loading a "FULL DISCUSSION: Canada PM Carney Predicts New World Order Without US at Explosive WEF Speech | AC1G" video?
The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.
How can I download "FULL DISCUSSION: Canada PM Carney Predicts New World Order Without US at Explosive WEF Speech | AC1G" video to my phone?
You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.
How can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "FULL DISCUSSION: Canada PM Carney Predicts New World Order Without US at Explosive WEF Speech | AC1G"?
The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.
How can I save a frame from a video "FULL DISCUSSION: Canada PM Carney Predicts New World Order Without US at Explosive WEF Speech | AC1G"?
This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.
How do I play and download streaming video?
- in video formats, hover your mouse over "Streaming Video**";
- right-click on "Copy link";
- open VLC-player;
- select Media - Open Network Stream - Network in the menu;
- paste the copied link into the input field;
- click "Play".
- copy the video address (URL);
- select "Open Network Stream" in the "Media" item of VLC player and paste the link to the video into the input field;
- click on the arrow on the "Play" button and select "Convert" in the list;
- select "Video - H.264 + MP3 (MP4)" in the "Profile" line;
- click the "Browse" button to select a folder to save the converted video and click the "Start" button;
- conversion speed depends on the resolution and duration of the video.
For this purpose you need VLC-player, which can be downloaded for free from the official website https://www.videolan.org/vlc/.
How to play streaming video through VLC player:
To download streaming video via VLC player, you need to convert it:
Warning: this download method no longer works with most YouTube videos.
What's the price of all this stuff?
It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.