Download "A FUEL-FREE GENERATOR has entered production. But the Global Ban on BTG and Einstein's criticism ..."

Looking at the household and digital appliances around us, each of us thinks that alternating current technology is the pinnacle of technological evolution. But we still know very little about the nature of electricity. What then can we say about the ether, the theory of which was developed as a counterweight to Einstein's relativism? Scientists have established that as the Earth moves through space, it loses some of its atmospheric matter. However, the planet retains an atmosphere, meaning that the lost matter is restored. This is also true for other substances that form our planet. One such example of the synthesis of substances is the recovery of oil in depleted wells. It turns out that 150% of previously estimated reserves have been recovered from long-discovered fields. And there are many such places on Earth: Georgia, the Carpathians, and South America. In Russia, the Romashkinskoye oil field, discovered over 70 years ago, is one of the top ten supergiant fields according to the international classification. It was considered 80% depleted, but its reserves are replenished by 1.5-2 million tons annually. According to new calculations, oil can be produced until 2200, and that's not the limit. The first well at the Old Oil Fields of Grozny was drilled in the late 19th century, and by the middle of the last century, 100 million tons of oil had been pumped. The field was later considered depleted, but 50 years later, reserves began to recover. So, the synthesis of elements on our planet is not a miracle or anomaly—it is a natural phenomenon. Water synthesizes under certain conditions and in certain areas of our planet's heterogeneity. The water cycle undoubtedly exists in nature, but it is a process of matter transformation, or, as some would say, materialization from the ether. Vernadsky even proposed that the decay of some substances and the synthesis of others occur in the Earth's crust. In 1911, he presented a paper entitled "On the Gas Exchange of the Earth's Crust" in St. Petersburg at the Second Mendeleev Congress. Incidentally, Mendeleev originally placed ether at the very beginning of his periodic table; for more details, see our other issue. Another great scientist of the early twentieth century, Nikola Tesla, on the contrary, proposed that ether was a highly dense substance, not a gas. The concept of ether as being present everywhere and influencing our material world, but not perceptible to the senses, has existed since ancient times: from ideas in Eastern teachings to the philosophy of Ancient Greece. Later, René Descartes translated the concept of ether from a philosophical and religious perspective to a scientific one. Later, with the development of optics, it was empirically discovered that light has a wave nature. Thus, the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries saw the flourishing of numerous theories and models of the ether. And the ether theory didn't fade away; it was destroyed. For example, back in 1922, on its 100th anniversary, the German Scientific Society decided to ban criticism of the theory of relativity in official academic circles. As a result, Germany banned criticism of relativism (the theory of relativity) in the academic press and in education. This ban, which has been in effect since 1922, remains in effect today. The same position was reaffirmed by the Nazi government after the outbreak of World War II in 1940 in Munich, where a decree was issued recognizing the theory of relativity as the foundation for the development of physical science. And this despite the nationality of the "father of relativism." After the fall of Nazism in 1945, criticism of the theory of relativity was equated with Holocaust denial and anti-Semitism by Einstein himself. "A special form of anti-Semitism," he said. A prime example of chutzpah. And what about the Soviet Union? In 1922, Einstein became a Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and in 1926, an Honorary Foreign Member of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Even such a prominent Soviet scientist as A.K. Timiryazev, after reporting at the 5th Congress of Physicists on the experiments of the American physicist D.K. Miller, which refuted Einstein's theories, was ostracized by supporters of the theory of relativity, namely by the eminent Soviet relativists Ioffe, Tamm, Frenkel, Landsberg, and Mandelstam. In 1930, Glavnauki closed the Physical Society, leaving only the Association of Physicists, led by Ioffe. In 1934, the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) issued a special resolution on the debate on relativism, classifying all opponents of the theory of relativity as either "right-wing deviationists" or "Menshevik idealists." From 1938 onward, the USSR Academy of Sciences did not fund any scientific work that even slightly contradicted the theory of relativity. And, as a culmination, in 1964, the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences issued a classified resolution prohib...