Download "🚨Trump’s DARK PAST Surfaces in DATA SET 8 of EPSTEIN FILES"

Download this video with UDL Client
  • Video mp4 HD+ with sound
  • Mp3 in the best quality
  • Any size files
Video tags
|

Video tags

meidastouch
meidas touch
politics
political videos
political advertising
breaking news
ben meiselas
midas touch
midastouch
donald trump
trump
joe biden
biden
president
elections
republicans
democrats
democratic party
republican party
trump indictments
legal news
michael popok
gop
current events
department of justice
justice department
political news
msnbc
cnn
cable news
independent media
united states
us news
Subtitles
|

Subtitles

00:00:00
We told you that Donald Trump's dark
00:00:02
past would surface. We told you he could
00:00:04
run, but he could not hide. Now, new
00:00:08
Epstein documents are surfacing on
00:00:11
Monday night are very, very, very
00:00:14
concerning. I want to share them with
00:00:16
you and I want to share with you the
00:00:18
sequence of what went down yesterday. So
00:00:22
earlier in the day, Democratic Congress
00:00:24
member Ro Kana stated that he had heard
00:00:28
that the DOJ would be producing another
00:00:31
batch of Epstein files in the afternoon.
00:00:34
People waited for the afternoon and
00:00:37
those files were not produced. So we at
00:00:40
the Midas touch network entered a search
00:00:43
term to look for data set 8 using the
00:00:48
prior search formats and constructs even
00:00:52
though it wasn't on the DOJ website. And
00:00:55
sure enough that actually opened up a
00:00:58
website for data set 8 even though it
00:01:01
was not posted on the DOJ website. So at
00:01:05
the Midas touch network, we quickly
00:01:07
downloaded everything on data set 8. It
00:01:10
was tens of thousands of documents.
00:01:12
Still nowhere near the complete file
00:01:15
that constitutes the Epstein files, but
00:01:18
there were tens of thousands of records.
00:01:20
We downloaded them and we started going
00:01:22
through them document by document. Some
00:01:25
of these documents raise a lot of
00:01:28
serious questions and the fact that it
00:01:30
was not posted on the DOJ website also
00:01:34
raised some red flags. Then later in the
00:01:38
evening on Monday night, the DOJ posted
00:01:42
set 8. Now, some of these documents that
00:01:45
we uncovered that I say raise these
00:01:48
concerns, these red flags were moved.
00:01:51
still there, but the document numbers
00:01:55
were shifted and so you had to go and
00:01:58
re-examine them to determine where they
00:02:01
were. So, it also raises some serious
00:02:04
questions. Why were they manipulating
00:02:06
and changing the document numbers on
00:02:10
these pages within a matter of hours?
00:02:13
And what else might they be covering up?
00:02:16
So, here's one of the messages that we
00:02:20
uncovered. Let me read it to you. In
00:02:23
data set 8 of the Epstein files
00:02:25
released, which was briefly posted on
00:02:28
the Justice Department's website
00:02:30
yesterday, there is a letter alleging to
00:02:33
be sent from Jeffrey Epstein to
00:02:35
convicted sex offender Larry Nasser.
00:02:38
Remember Larry Nasser? You know who that
00:02:41
was? the American convicted serial sex
00:02:43
offender, former family medicine
00:02:46
physician. He was the team doctor of the
00:02:49
United States Women's National Gymn
00:02:51
Gymnastics Team and a physician at
00:02:53
Michigan State University where he
00:02:56
sexually assaulted hundreds potentially
00:02:58
thousands of young girls. So, in the
00:03:02
Epstein files, in data set 8, which was
00:03:06
briefly posted and then posted later in
00:03:09
the night with different bait numbers,
00:03:11
document numbers, there's this letter
00:03:13
which was postmarked just days after
00:03:16
Epstein died. Here's how it reads. Dear
00:03:19
LN, LN Larry Nasser. Dear LN, as you
00:03:23
know by now, I have taken the short
00:03:26
route home. Good luck. We shared one
00:03:28
thing, our love and caring for young
00:03:31
ladies at the hope they'd reach their
00:03:34
full potential. Our president shares our
00:03:37
love. Our love of young new girls. When
00:03:41
a young beauty walked by, he loved to
00:03:44
quote grab snatch. Whereas we ended up
00:03:47
snatching grub in the mess halls of the
00:03:50
system. Life is unfair. Yours, J. Epste.
00:03:55
Now, this letter, you analyze it, was
00:03:58
returned to sender. Reporting indicates
00:04:01
that Epstein sent a letter to Nasser
00:04:04
from prison before his alleged suicide.
00:04:07
The contents of that letter was never
00:04:09
revealed. Additional documents show that
00:04:12
the letter was submitted for handwriting
00:04:15
analysis within the FBI, though it's
00:04:18
unclear if investigators ever reached a
00:04:20
conclusion on whether or not this letter
00:04:23
was definitively written by Jeffrey
00:04:25
Epstein. So these images had the
00:04:28
document numbers or we call them Bates
00:04:30
numbers. EFTA 36086,
00:04:34
36085.
00:04:36
And then there were the various uh
00:04:38
forensic analysis documents 36076,
00:04:42
36077 and 36078 where it was actually
00:04:46
sent out to a lab for a handwriting
00:04:50
analysis to see if it was Epstein's and
00:04:52
we never got back those results or we
00:04:55
don't know where those uh results are as
00:04:58
of now. Now, in addition to that, there
00:05:02
was another document that we uncovered
00:05:05
that I want to share with you, which
00:05:07
raises a lot of red flags. Here it is.
00:05:11
Right here, you'll see the document
00:05:13
number EFT
00:05:15
29798.
00:05:18
Subject: Epstein flight records, dated
00:05:21
January 8th, 2020. Let me read it to you
00:05:24
for your and by the way this is a letter
00:05:26
sent by assistant United States
00:05:29
attorneys. So these are federal
00:05:31
prosecutors from the Southern District
00:05:33
of New York. They were the ones who
00:05:35
would have been prosecuting Epstein uh
00:05:37
before he died by alleged suicide and
00:05:40
they were the ones who successfully
00:05:42
prosecuted Gilain Maxwell. Morin Comey
00:05:45
was the successful prosecutor who Donald
00:05:48
Trump fired a few months ago. But here's
00:05:51
one of the internal emails relating to
00:05:54
Epstein flight records from those
00:05:56
Southern District of New York
00:05:57
prosecutors. Let me read it. For your
00:05:59
situational awareness, wanted to let you
00:06:02
know that the flight records we received
00:06:04
yesterday reflect that Donald Trump
00:06:06
traveled on Epstein's private jet many
00:06:09
more times than previously has been
00:06:11
reported or that we were aware of,
00:06:14
including during the period we would
00:06:16
expect to charge in a Maxwell case. In
00:06:20
particular, he is listed as a passenger
00:06:23
on at least eight flights between 1993
00:06:26
and 1996,
00:06:28
including at least four flights on which
00:06:30
Maxwell was also present. He is listed
00:06:33
as having traveled with, among others,
00:06:35
and at various times Marlon Maples, his
00:06:37
daughter Tiffany, and his son Eric. On
00:06:40
one flight in 1993, he and Epstein are
00:06:43
the only two listed passengers. On
00:06:45
another, the only three passengers are
00:06:48
Epstein, Trump and then 20-year-old and
00:06:50
this is redacted. Often these redactions
00:06:53
are associated with victims. On two
00:06:56
other flights, two of the passengers
00:06:58
respectively were women who would be
00:07:00
possible witnesses in a Maxwell case.
00:07:03
We've just finished reviewing the full
00:07:05
records. More than 100 pages of very
00:07:08
small script and didn't want any of this
00:07:11
to be a surprise down the road. And this
00:07:13
is signed by an assistant US attorney
00:07:16
for the Southern District of New York.
00:07:17
In other words, a federal prosecutor
00:07:20
sent this email. And you'll see it has
00:07:22
document number 29798.
00:07:26
Now, that first letter that purports to
00:07:29
be from Epstein to Larry Nasser, that
00:07:33
was sent here. Pull it up right here.
00:07:35
Look at the date. August 13th of 2019.
00:07:39
And that was postmarked a few days
00:07:42
actually after Epstein died. But we've
00:07:45
heard about the potential existence of a
00:07:49
letter like that before and this idea
00:07:52
that Epstein may have sent a letter and
00:07:54
it may have been rejected and sent back
00:07:57
after he died. Now, the Associated Press
00:08:01
actually did public records requests
00:08:03
back in 2023 to the Bureau of Prison.
00:08:07
They found emails that reference that
00:08:10
letter, but they never were able to
00:08:12
uncover the actual letter. Just emails
00:08:14
back and forth that reference the
00:08:17
Epstein Nasser letter. So, this was an
00:08:19
article from June 2nd, 2023. Prison
00:08:22
documents reveal Jeffrey Epstein tried
00:08:25
to reach out to Larry Nasser, gymnastics
00:08:28
coach, convicted of sexual abuse. While
00:08:30
he was in prison, disgraced financeier
00:08:32
Jeffrey Epstein sent a letter to Larry
00:08:34
Nasser, the former Olympic doctor who
00:08:36
sexually abused girls for decades. New
00:08:38
documents reveal the Associated Press
00:08:40
first reported the discovery, which was
00:08:42
found in the midst of over 4,000 pages
00:08:45
of documents. The news agency obtained
00:08:47
nearly four years after Epstein, who was
00:08:49
accused of child sex trafficking, died
00:08:51
of an apparent suicide in New York City
00:08:54
jail while awaiting trial. The new
00:08:56
documents offer additional insight into
00:08:58
what documents previously released by
00:09:00
the Federal Bureau of Prisons, BOP, in
00:09:03
2021 revealed about Epstein suicide. The
00:09:06
documents were acquired from the Bureau
00:09:07
of Prisons under the Freedom of
00:09:09
Information Act and shed light on
00:09:11
Epstein's death and his behavior during
00:09:13
his 36 days at the Metropolitan
00:09:15
Correction Center, MCC, including his
00:09:18
attempt to connect with Nasser.
00:09:20
According to the AP, an investigator
00:09:22
discovered Epstein's letter to Nasser in
00:09:24
the jail mail room weeks after Epstein
00:09:27
was found dead. According to the
00:09:29
documents, the letter was not part of
00:09:31
the documents obtained by either the AP
00:09:34
or CNN. But the documents reference that
00:09:36
the letter was returned to the jail in
00:09:38
September 2019, weeks after Epstein's
00:09:41
death. Quote, "It appeared he mailed it
00:09:43
out and it was returned back to him."
00:09:45
The investigator told a prison official
00:09:48
in an email included in the documents.
00:09:50
Quote, "I'm not sure if I should open it
00:09:52
or if we should hand it over to anyone."
00:09:55
The copy of the email exchanged by CNN
00:09:58
obtained by CNN is redacted and does not
00:10:01
reference Nasser by name. But in their
00:10:03
reply, an MCC staff attorney described
00:10:06
the original address of Epstein's letter
00:10:09
as quote, "The former doctor of the US
00:10:11
female gymnastics team that was
00:10:13
convicted of molesting a bunch of girls
00:10:15
under the guide of medical procedures
00:10:17
examinations." The attorney added, "Some
00:10:20
of the victim accounts are pretty
00:10:21
horrific." It is unclear if the two men
00:10:24
had any relationship. Also, an article
00:10:27
from the Guardian described the letter
00:10:29
from Epstein to Nasser that was
00:10:31
previously uh reported among the
00:10:34
documents that were uh found in the mail
00:10:37
room weeks after Epstein's death. Okay.
00:10:41
So, I want to give you all of that
00:10:43
context. So that letter purportedly sent
00:10:46
from Epstein and Nasser was referenced
00:10:48
before, but the actual letter itself was
00:10:51
never uncovered potentially until what
00:10:54
was just um released right there. Also,
00:10:57
you have that other letter from the top
00:10:59
federal prosecutors in the Southern
00:11:01
District of New York referencing Trump
00:11:04
being on the jet with Epstein more than
00:11:06
they even expected right there. But what
00:11:09
this is all telling me as well is that
00:11:11
there's a lot more documents out there.
00:11:14
Specifically, the documents that really
00:11:16
need to be released right now are the
00:11:20
FBI interviews with the victims, with
00:11:23
the witnesses, with all of these people,
00:11:27
right? I mean, when we talk about Trump
00:11:30
being on the jet with Epstein more than
00:11:32
those federal prosecutors expected,
00:11:34
they're also referencing an entire
00:11:36
corpus of evidence and witness
00:11:38
interviews that have yet to be released.
00:11:41
Those are the documents that need to get
00:11:43
out there. And if what I'm sharing with
00:11:45
you references Trump or potentially
00:11:48
references Trump in these settings, you
00:11:50
could judge for yourself. I'm expressing
00:11:52
to you opinion protected by the First
00:11:54
Amendment of the United States
00:11:56
Constitution. Right. I'm giving you my
00:11:58
opinion here by showing you what's been
00:12:00
produced and I have a right to give you
00:12:02
my first amendment opinion. I want to
00:12:04
see victims. All this is protected by
00:12:06
first amendment opinion. Right? So I
00:12:08
want to also I want to get you the
00:12:10
witness statements. I want to get the
00:12:12
FBI statements. I want to get you all
00:12:14
these victim and survivor statements. So
00:12:17
um yesterday before all this news even
00:12:20
broke, I had the opportunity to
00:12:22
interview with Democratic Congress
00:12:24
member Ro Kana. He's the Congress member
00:12:26
who had put forward the discharge
00:12:28
petition with Republican Thomas Massie
00:12:30
and he was spot on when he was saying we
00:12:32
know there's a cover up taking place and
00:12:35
we want to see the FBI witness
00:12:37
interviews especially in light of
00:12:39
everything that I just shared with you.
00:12:41
We need to see that. So because what was
00:12:44
just uncovered that I'm sharing with you
00:12:46
was all yesterday evening and the Midas
00:12:49
Touch Network was one of the first to
00:12:50
break this. Let me show you the
00:12:52
interview I did with Democratic Congress
00:12:54
member Ro Kana slightly earlier in the
00:12:56
day. Um, but this this works perfectly
00:12:59
together. Let me show you what my
00:13:01
interview with Congress member Connor
00:13:02
said. Here, play this clip. So, look,
00:13:04
rather than us just speculating about
00:13:07
what our sources are saying, why don't I
00:13:09
bring in Democratic Congress member
00:13:11
Roana? Ro Kana along with Republican
00:13:14
Congress member Thomas Massie were the
00:13:16
ones who put forward this discharge
00:13:19
petition that became the Epstein
00:13:21
transparency act that the Trump regime
00:13:24
has now violated. So let's bring in
00:13:26
Democratic Congress member Kana.
00:13:28
Congressman Kana, it is great to be with
00:13:30
you right now. So my question for you is
00:13:33
my sourcing tells me that all the
00:13:35
victims and survivors that have been
00:13:37
speaking with Congress members like
00:13:39
yourself are saying that get those FBI
00:13:43
uh interviews released. Those FBI
00:13:45
interviews mention some of these other
00:13:48
uh men, these Wall Street tycoons, these
00:13:51
politicians, these other people. They'll
00:13:53
be on those FBI files. So if there was a
00:13:56
hierarchy, wouldn't we want those FBI
00:13:59
interviews? And and what else could we
00:14:01
be doing with this Trump regime right
00:14:04
now given their obstructive behavior,
00:14:06
their criminal behavior? Congressman
00:14:09
Ben, you nailed it. As usual, you got to
00:14:12
the heart of the matter. This is what
00:14:14
it's all about. The FBI interviews with
00:14:18
the survivors. You know what is
00:14:20
appalling? You've got justice releasing
00:14:23
the names of survivors. They're
00:14:25
literally releasing the names of
00:14:27
survivors, which they're not allowed to
00:14:28
do by law. But they're not releasing the
00:14:31
FBI interview files with those same
00:14:34
survivors. And the FBI interview files
00:14:37
have the names of other men. They have
00:14:40
the names of the Wall Street tycoons,
00:14:42
the politicians who visited Epstein's
00:14:44
rape island and who either engaged in
00:14:48
the rape of these underage girls or
00:14:49
covered it up. How do I know? Because
00:14:51
I've talked to the survivors. I've
00:14:52
talked to the survivors lawyers who were
00:14:54
at the FBI interviews, who gave these
00:14:57
names, who are saying release them. But
00:14:59
you have the Department of Justice more
00:15:01
concerned with protecting the
00:15:03
reputations of these men than they are
00:15:05
protecting the reputation of these
00:15:07
survivors. So, you know, I hope everyone
00:15:09
listens to your 90 seconds because
00:15:11
that's what it's all about. It's not we
00:15:12
don't need all 300 gigabits. We don't
00:15:14
need all the documents. I mean, I'd like
00:15:16
that's what the law calls for. What we
00:15:18
need is those interview memorandum. And
00:15:19
if you if people don't think it's a
00:15:21
hoax, I mean, it's not because I've
00:15:22
talked to the survivors, then just
00:15:23
release the the the interview memos and
00:15:25
we'll put it to to rest. But I guarantee
00:15:27
you once those interview memorandum are
00:15:30
released, there are going to be other
00:15:32
powerful men implicated. Well,
00:15:34
Congressman, what happens next though
00:15:36
when the Trump regime doesn't produce
00:15:38
this? Now, I've seen you and Congressman
00:15:40
Massie talk about inherent contempt.
00:15:43
What does that mean? What else is being
00:15:46
discussed? And let's face it, I mean,
00:15:47
it's great that Thomas Massie is a
00:15:50
Republican in a bipartisan way working
00:15:52
with you and you could pull in a handful
00:15:54
of others as we saw with the discharge
00:15:56
petition, but you've got people like
00:15:58
James Comr who actually chairs the
00:16:00
oversight committee and he's like, "This
00:16:02
was great. This is transparency. This is
00:16:04
amazing." So, how do you deal with all
00:16:07
of that?
00:16:08
>> James Comr is part of the 3%. The Thomas
00:16:11
Massie put out a poll to his supporters
00:16:13
to the MAGA base. How many people think
00:16:15
it was transparent? 3%. How many think
00:16:18
it was not transparent? 97%. I have
00:16:20
never had more MAGA Republicans back me
00:16:24
up than uh when I called out Pam Bondi.
00:16:27
One said, "I don't ever retweet Indians,
00:16:29
but I'm going to make an exception and
00:16:31
retweet Kana because he's right about
00:16:33
Pam Bondi." I mean, these are the kind
00:16:35
of MAGA people who are upset with what
00:16:38
Pam Bondi has done. They know it is
00:16:40
total fabrication. They know that
00:16:42
they're hiding and protecting these rich
00:16:44
and powerful men. And you know, Massie
00:16:46
and I, we don't stand at convention. You
00:16:49
know, we have some people in our own
00:16:50
party saying, "Well, we got to have a
00:16:52
process and it's too premature." Come
00:16:54
on. We know she's lying. So, we said,
00:16:56
"We're going to introduce inherent
00:16:57
contempt." That means that every day she
00:17:01
doesn't produce a document after a
00:17:03
certain grace period, she's going to be
00:17:04
fined, $5,000, and the sergeant-at-arms
00:17:07
can actually arrest her uh to do that.
00:17:09
Now, whether that actually comes to
00:17:11
pass, it scared them enough that they
00:17:13
suddenly started to release unredacted
00:17:16
versions of the documents that they
00:17:17
released that were redacted. Why?
00:17:19
Because they know that Republicans are
00:17:21
going to support our contempt
00:17:23
proceeding. They know that Susan Walls,
00:17:25
the White House chief of staff, is livid
00:17:28
at how botched Bandi has been and the
00:17:31
DOJ has been. They know that the MAGA
00:17:33
base on this issue, not on any other
00:17:35
issue. On this issue, the MAGA base
00:17:37
disapproves of Donald Trump
00:17:39
overwhelmingly. And our final step is
00:17:42
going to be with the survivors. We've
00:17:44
talked to them today. They're willing to
00:17:45
come to the capital again to relive
00:17:47
their trauma a third time. The first
00:17:50
time they came, we passed it through the
00:17:51
House. The second time they came, we
00:17:53
passed it through the Senate and the
00:17:55
president signed it. And the third time
00:17:57
they came, the whole country is going to
00:17:58
be watching. I don't think Pam Bondi
00:18:00
wants that. she should release the
00:18:02
files.
00:18:03
>> Can you share maybe some of the other uh
00:18:06
things under consideration in terms of
00:18:08
legal action? I think you have your
00:18:11
quasi civil criminal, this inherent
00:18:14
contempt, these fines and perhaps
00:18:17
criminal referrals. Um, I think people
00:18:19
want the documents too that like people
00:18:21
still is there a process to get at the
00:18:24
documents and you know I've tried to
00:18:26
wear my former litigation cap in these
00:18:29
big types of cases and I'm thinking you
00:18:31
know in these big disputes where I
00:18:32
fought over terabytes of documents when
00:18:35
I was taking down big Ponzi schemers out
00:18:37
here in California the big medcap Ponzi
00:18:40
scheme I was involved you may remember
00:18:41
that back in California back in the day
00:18:43
you know as well you know we had three
00:18:45
four five terabytes way actually more
00:18:47
documents than here and you would bring
00:18:49
in discovery referees and people who can
00:18:52
help, you know, turn it over. So, I just
00:18:54
wonder if there's any jurisdiction
00:18:56
amongst any of the federal records that
00:18:59
have released these grand jury
00:19:00
transcripts because you noticed on that
00:19:03
so-called fact sheet that the DOJ put
00:19:06
out, which is like a lie sheet about
00:19:08
their cover up, they try to blame it on
00:19:10
the judges and say the judges are the
00:19:12
one holding up. So, I just wonder, you
00:19:13
show it to Judge Angle Meer and Burman,
00:19:16
you're like, "Look what they're saying.
00:19:17
and they're saying you have
00:19:18
jurisdiction. Let's get a referee. Let's
00:19:20
turn this stuff over.
00:19:22
>> It's a brilliant suggestion and I was
00:19:23
actually talking to several of the
00:19:25
lawyers on the oversight committee and
00:19:26
others about exactly your suggestion
00:19:28
that we take it back to the federal
00:19:30
judge. uh that federal judge uh has
00:19:33
already ruled that these documents
00:19:35
should be released based on the Epstein
00:19:37
transparency law. And we said, look, you
00:19:38
should appoint a special master uh to
00:19:41
see what should be redacted to uh to
00:19:43
protect victim identity, but not
00:19:45
redacted to protect rich and powerful
00:19:47
men who raped underage girls. And why
00:19:50
don't you make a determination about
00:19:51
what complies with the law? A lot of the
00:19:54
law professors and others who have
00:19:56
looked at it and legal experts have said
00:19:58
what the Justice Department doesn't pass
00:20:00
the laugh test in terms of compliance
00:20:02
with our law because our law explicitly
00:20:04
says two things. Internal communications
00:20:06
need to be released. Work product needs
00:20:08
to be released. Draft of decisions
00:20:10
whether to charge or not need to be
00:20:12
released and they're claiming workforce
00:20:14
work product privilege. Well, we
00:20:15
explicitly drafted the statute to make
00:20:17
that an excuse that they couldn't use.
00:20:20
Our our our law also says you can't
00:20:22
consider reputational harm. You can't
00:20:25
consider embarrassment. They're out
00:20:26
there saying, "Well, we want to protect
00:20:27
some of these rich men because they
00:20:29
weren't charged and there's no
00:20:31
corroborating evidence." No, you can't
00:20:32
use that. If there is an accusation in a
00:20:35
witness memorandum, you need to release
00:20:37
that. So, going to these judges is an
00:20:39
excellent strategy. By the way, it
00:20:41
doesn't have to be Congress. It can be
00:20:43
any uh litigation that that that does
00:20:46
that. It could be the survivors. It
00:20:48
could be a nonprofit whistleblowing
00:20:50
agency, go to the federal judges, ask
00:20:52
for a special master, have them review
00:20:54
the documents. Uh that probably is uh
00:20:57
another way that we're going to get to
00:20:59
the truth of the matter,
00:21:01
>> right? You have that you can bring an
00:21:02
injunctive relief action and initiative
00:21:04
proceeding. Maybe you relate it uh to
00:21:07
the you know, it's it's so fascinating
00:21:08
the you know, enforcing this enforcing
00:21:12
the law that you created. What I find
00:21:14
fascinating too, and you probably find
00:21:16
use a different uh word for for it other
00:21:19
than fascinating, is Todd Blanch is
00:21:21
saying, "Look, the drafters of this,
00:21:23
Kana and Massie, they never excluded our
00:21:28
ability to assert attorney, client,
00:21:31
work, product, deliberative process,
00:21:33
privilege." He's like, he's expressly
00:21:35
said that in in that memo that I read
00:21:37
and he's like, "So, the law enables us
00:21:40
to do all of these." So before we go,
00:21:43
what do you say? You're the drafter of
00:21:44
the law. You and Massie came up with
00:21:46
this thing. So when he's out there
00:21:48
saying the drafters never stopped us
00:21:51
from doing that, what's the
00:21:52
congressional intent behind this? Well,
00:21:54
he's flat out wrong. And uh former
00:21:57
prosecutors have looked at this, former
00:21:59
law professors have looked at this have
00:22:01
said that's not going to survive five
00:22:03
minutes in front of a court. And the
00:22:05
reason is we explicitly wanted the word
00:22:07
product. What did we knew when we had
00:22:09
talked to survivors that we wanted the
00:22:11
60count draft indictment that uh had
00:22:14
been prepared on the Epstein case only
00:22:16
two counts were actually charged. Why
00:22:18
were the 60 counts dropped? We wanted
00:22:20
that draft indictment. We wanted the
00:22:22
draft prosecution memo. That's how we
00:22:24
drafted the language. So, we have a
00:22:26
section in a two-page bill, a section
00:22:28
saying any internal communication in the
00:22:31
Justice Department about whether to
00:22:33
charge or not needs to be released. It's
00:22:35
explicitly asking for the internal
00:22:38
deliberations for the work product. This
00:22:40
is not ambiguous and there is
00:22:42
congressional record and testimony about
00:22:45
how Massie and I want those explicit
00:22:47
documents. The survivors who are
00:22:49
standing with us are saying those are
00:22:51
the documents we want. So, you know,
00:22:54
Blanch is he just thinks that he could
00:22:56
have talked his way out of this and
00:22:58
everyone would forget because we're
00:22:59
headed to Christmas. That was their
00:23:01
strategy. And what's mindboggling to me
00:23:03
is that's been their strategy for the
00:23:05
last nine months. Let's just put
00:23:07
something out and it let hope people
00:23:09
forget. And Susan Wilds herself is
00:23:11
saying this is incompetent. This is a
00:23:13
whiff. And by the way, they're just
00:23:14
making it a bigger and bigger deal
00:23:17
because the average person at home is
00:23:18
saying, "Huh, they're exposing the
00:23:20
survivors, but they're not exposing the
00:23:23
people who are abusing the survivors.
00:23:25
Why are they hiding for these people?
00:23:27
What are they covering up? and what is
00:23:30
so corrupt about this system. And so
00:23:32
they're going to be in for a rude
00:23:34
awakening in January if they do not in
00:23:37
the next seven days get this stuff out
00:23:39
there. We uh I don't know if you can
00:23:41
share this, but uh any FBI
00:23:44
whistleblowers or DOJ whistleblowers who
00:23:48
may be uh on the horizon who's upset
00:23:52
about the way this was handed who may
00:23:53
have information.
00:23:54
>> We've had some uh approaching uh the the
00:23:57
our office and the committee. I
00:23:58
obviously can't get into get get into
00:24:01
the details, but uh there are people who
00:24:04
are upset about the non-compliance with
00:24:07
the law and they don't want to be held
00:24:09
accountable, right? Anyone who is at the
00:24:11
Justice Department who's involved with
00:24:13
this, who's not complying, could be
00:24:15
prosecuted for obstruction of justice.
00:24:16
Now, Pam Bondi is not going to prosecute
00:24:18
them and Donald Trump isn't going to
00:24:20
have a just an attorney general who
00:24:21
prosecutes them. But, you know, in 2029,
00:24:25
we're going to have a Democratic
00:24:26
president, and that Democratic president
00:24:28
is going to have an attorney general,
00:24:29
and that attorney general is going to
00:24:31
prosecute the law, not out of uh
00:24:34
vindictiveness, out of just saying that
00:24:36
you can't commit crimes and get away
00:24:37
with it. By the way, I think that should
00:24:39
apply to crimes not just in violating
00:24:41
the Epstein Transparency Act. I think it
00:24:43
should apply to crimes with ICE, crimes
00:24:45
in terms of the strikes in the
00:24:46
Caribbean. We need accountability before
00:24:48
reconciliation. So, if you're at the
00:24:50
Justice Department and you know that
00:24:52
you're violating the law, you probably
00:24:54
don't want obstruction of justice uh
00:24:56
charges brought against you. And that's
00:24:57
why I think more and more people are
00:24:59
speaking up. Well, I want to thank you,
00:25:01
Congress Member Connor, for joining us.
00:25:03
That was uh I think helpful for our
00:25:05
audience to understand what happens
00:25:08
next. Everybody, hit subscribe. Help us
00:25:10
get to 6 million subscribers. And again,
00:25:12
thank you, Congressman Connor, for
00:25:14
joining us. Let's get to 6 million
00:25:15
subscribers. The truth is more important
00:25:18
than ever. Check out our new truth over
00:25:20
lies collection at store.midistouch.com.
00:25:23
All 100% USA union made.
00:25:28
[music]

Description:

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on the shocking discovery from documents in data set 8 of the Epstein Files that the MeidasTouch Network was the first to report on. Visit https://www.meidasplus.com/ for more! MeidasTouch relies on SnapStream to record, watch, monitor, and clip the news. Get a FREE TRIAL of SnapStream by clicking here: https://go.snapstream.com/affiliate/meidastouch/meidasnews Support the MeidasTouch Network: https://www.patreon.com/meidastouch Add the MeidasTouch Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-meidastouch-podcast/id1510240831 Buy MeidasTouch Merch: https://store.meidastouch.com/ Follow MeidasTouch on Twitter: https://twitter.com/meidastouch Follow MeidasTouch on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser Follow MeidasTouch on Instagram: https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser Follow MeidasTouch on TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@meidastouch

Mediafile available in formats

popular icon
Popular
hd icon
HD video
audio icon
Only sound
total icon
All
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

question iconHow can I download "🚨Trump’s DARK PAST Surfaces in DATA SET 8 of EPSTEIN FILES" video?arrow icon

    http://univideos.ru/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.

    The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.

    UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.

    UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

question iconWhich format of "🚨Trump’s DARK PAST Surfaces in DATA SET 8 of EPSTEIN FILES" video should I choose?arrow icon

    The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

question iconWhy does my computer freeze when loading a "🚨Trump’s DARK PAST Surfaces in DATA SET 8 of EPSTEIN FILES" video?arrow icon

    The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

question iconHow can I download "🚨Trump’s DARK PAST Surfaces in DATA SET 8 of EPSTEIN FILES" video to my phone?arrow icon

    You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

question iconHow can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "🚨Trump’s DARK PAST Surfaces in DATA SET 8 of EPSTEIN FILES"?arrow icon

    The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

question iconHow can I save a frame from a video "🚨Trump’s DARK PAST Surfaces in DATA SET 8 of EPSTEIN FILES"?arrow icon

    This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

question iconHow do I play and download streaming video?arrow icon

    For this purpose you need VLC-player, which can be downloaded for free from the official website https://www.videolan.org/vlc/.

    How to play streaming video through VLC player:

    • in video formats, hover your mouse over "Streaming Video**";
    • right-click on "Copy link";
    • open VLC-player;
    • select Media - Open Network Stream - Network in the menu;
    • paste the copied link into the input field;
    • click "Play".

    To download streaming video via VLC player, you need to convert it:

    • copy the video address (URL);
    • select "Open Network Stream" in the "Media" item of VLC player and paste the link to the video into the input field;
    • click on the arrow on the "Play" button and select "Convert" in the list;
    • select "Video - H.264 + MP3 (MP4)" in the "Profile" line;
    • click the "Browse" button to select a folder to save the converted video and click the "Start" button;
    • conversion speed depends on the resolution and duration of the video.

    Warning: this download method no longer works with most YouTube videos.

question iconWhat's the price of all this stuff?arrow icon

    It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.